The excitement generated by Jim and his campaign has brought about opportunities in other races that require him to leave the Congressional race and "leave his options open."
Friday, December 4, 2009
Purcell: Not leaving the war, just changing battlefields
Purcell Keeps Options Open
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Kristin McCarter 615-598-2786
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 3rd, 2009
Purcell Keeps Options Open
BATAVIA. Joined by his wife, Jill, Batavia businessman Jim Purcell announced today the end of his campaign for the Republican nomination to the 14th Congressional District, citing his desire not to divide the conservative vote.
“My decision today is to ‘take one for the team.’ It is extremely important that Republicans take back the 14th Congressional District from Bill Foster and Nancy Pelosi. But the only way this will happen is if Republicans nominate a conservative candidate not plugged into the “establishment” that is responsible for losing our majority in Congress.”
Purcell said he is concerned that an Ethan Hastert victory in the primary would only lead to a Republican loss in the fall.
“Ethan is a very nice young man, but the reality is that his family is a liability in the General Election. Dennis Hastert is the very kind of Republican that voters resoundingly rejected in 2006. I don’t believe Ethan will be able to get past that, regardless of how far “right” he runs in the primary. Voters are tired of actors. They want real leadership.”
Purcell thanked all his supporters for their hard work and dedication during his campaign.
“The most satisfying part of my campaign was meeting some fantastic people from all over the 14th District. I was greatly humbled by the support I received and know that all the work put into my campaign was done not for me, but for our country and our children. I am proud to be a part of a community of so many patriots and I encourage them to continue the fight.”
Purcell said that his withdrawal from the Republican Primary does not mean the end of his involvement in politics.
“I continue to have a deep desire to help our community, our state, and our country. But as my wife has reminded me many times, ‘there are many ways to do that.’ As usual, she is right. So all I can say is ‘stay tuned, because I’m here to stay.’”
***Illinois State Senator Chris Lauzen may have comments. Please contact his office directly at 630-264-2334.***
###
CONTACT: Kristin McCarter 615-598-2786
THURSDAY, DECEMBER 3rd, 2009
Purcell Keeps Options Open
BATAVIA. Joined by his wife, Jill, Batavia businessman Jim Purcell announced today the end of his campaign for the Republican nomination to the 14th Congressional District, citing his desire not to divide the conservative vote.
“My decision today is to ‘take one for the team.’ It is extremely important that Republicans take back the 14th Congressional District from Bill Foster and Nancy Pelosi. But the only way this will happen is if Republicans nominate a conservative candidate not plugged into the “establishment” that is responsible for losing our majority in Congress.”
Purcell said he is concerned that an Ethan Hastert victory in the primary would only lead to a Republican loss in the fall.
“Ethan is a very nice young man, but the reality is that his family is a liability in the General Election. Dennis Hastert is the very kind of Republican that voters resoundingly rejected in 2006. I don’t believe Ethan will be able to get past that, regardless of how far “right” he runs in the primary. Voters are tired of actors. They want real leadership.”
Purcell thanked all his supporters for their hard work and dedication during his campaign.
“The most satisfying part of my campaign was meeting some fantastic people from all over the 14th District. I was greatly humbled by the support I received and know that all the work put into my campaign was done not for me, but for our country and our children. I am proud to be a part of a community of so many patriots and I encourage them to continue the fight.”
Purcell said that his withdrawal from the Republican Primary does not mean the end of his involvement in politics.
“I continue to have a deep desire to help our community, our state, and our country. But as my wife has reminded me many times, ‘there are many ways to do that.’ As usual, she is right. So all I can say is ‘stay tuned, because I’m here to stay.’”
***Illinois State Senator Chris Lauzen may have comments. Please contact his office directly at 630-264-2334.***
###
Tuesday, December 1, 2009
Purcell to Obama: America Needs Decisive Leadership
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Kristin McCarter 615-598-2786
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 1st, 2009
Purcell to Obama: America Needs Decisive Leadership
BATAVIA – Batavia businessman Jim Purcell, Republican candidate for the 14th Congressional District, issued the following statement regarding President Obama's speech on the American policy in Afghanistan:
"I'm very concerned about a Commander in-Chief who wants to dip his toe in the water and leave at the same time. It seems that the President wants to play both sides of the fence… again. We need decisive leadership. We can’t afford to wait 3 months for a decision that is the equivalent of being “almost pregnant.” When you go to war, you have to go “all in.” Otherwise, it’s not worth it."
Sunday, November 22, 2009
Purcell: 2010 will be a Big Year for Republican Candidates— but what about Republican Voters?
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Kristin McCarter 615-598-2786
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22nd, 2009
Purcell: 2010 will be a Big Year for RepublicanCandidates— but what about Republican Voters?
BATAVIA. Batavia businessman Jim Purcell, Republican candidate for the 14th Congressional district, released the following statement regarding the U.S. Senate’s historic vote to move forward with debate on the Obama/Reid Healthcare Bill:
“Yesterday’s party line vote to move forward a $2.5 TRILLION so-called ‘health care reform’ bill demonstrates just how out of touch Democrats are with most Americans. Next year could make the 1994 Republican Revolution look like a small-town parade by comparison. But the sad reality of recent history is that what has been good for Republican candidates has not always been good for Republican voters.
“Republicans lost control of Congress in 2006 because the American people lost confidence in the GOP’s ability to lead the country. And for good reason. Instead of being the conservative change our country needed, the GOP became part of the problem.
“Now, Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi, and Bill Foster are getting their chance to show the American people just how incompetently they govern. Republicans can win in 2010—but not with the same kind of Republicans that lost our majority in 2006.
“I believe I am the only candidate running in the 14th Congressional with the ability to inspire the confidence of Republican and Independent voters in the district feeling disenfranchised by ‘politics as usual.’
“Restoring the confidence of voters will defeat Bill Foster and Barack Obama next fall, but, more importantly, start rolling back the failed policies of the last 20 years and ensure our children have a prosperous future.”
Saturday, November 21, 2009
Purcell: Newt is part of the problem, not the solution
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
CONTACT: Kristin McCarter 615-598-2786
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 22nd, 2009
Purcell: Newt is part of the problem, not the solution
BATAVIA – Batavia businessman Jim Purcell, Republican candidate for the 14th Congressional District, issued the following statement regarding former Speaker Newt Gingrich’s endorsement of Ethan Hastert:
“Newt Gingrich is very good at talking like a conservative. But the reality is when he was Speaker of the House, the federal government grew to a size that Bill and Hillary Clinton never dreamed of. Republicans like Newt Gingrich lost us our majority in Congress in 2006 and could seriously hurt us in 2010. Republican voters want a candidate who will fight for the conservative principles that made our nation great, not a politician who is all sizzle and no steak.”
A brawl the GOP needs
A surprisingly great article from the Washington 'comPost.' It sounds exactly like my press release "Bring it on" from last week.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Sarah Palin, with her personality and history, to tell Rush Limbaugh that Republicans should welcome primary fights within their own ranks is hardly surprising.As much as it may pain her many critics, she also has a lot of history on her side.
Many Republicans, looking at the recent fiasco in New York's 23rd Congressional District, argue that the endorsement by Palin and her talk-radio buddies of a rigid right-winger running on the Conservative Party ticket cost Republicans a House seat they had held for more than a century. They worry that the populist anti-establishment "rogues" like Palin will kill GOP prospects for a comeback in 2010 by backing ideologues in many other primaries and scaring off independents and moderate Republicans
They are wasting their breath on Palin, who got to be governor of Alaska by knocking off incumbent Gov. Frank Murkowski in a Republican primary in 2006. When she told Limbaugh, "What I appreciate about the Republican Party [is] we have contested, aggressive, competitive primaries," she had that fight in mind.
Tuesday, November 17, 2009
Jim Purcell's Responses to Questions Posed at Kane County Republican Party 14th Congressional District Candidates Forum
NOTICE: Due to a long-standing commitment, Jim Purcell is unable to attend the Kane County Republican Party's 14th Congressional District Candidates Forum on Sunday, November 15th, 2009 in Geneva. However, the Kane County GOP submitted questions ahead of time to all candidates. Below are the candidate questions followed by Purcell's responses. The responses can also be found at www.purcellforcongress.com.
Q. Government spending has reached into the billions of dollars in so-called stimulus, and government bailout, yet unemployment in some Kane County communities is over 12%. Small businesses are having trouble succeeding and homes are still being foreclosed. What do you feel really needs to be done to grow the economy and put America back to work?
PURCELL: Economic growth and government growth are mutually exclusive. The first step in stopping our economic decline is to stop the bleeding. Our economic hemorrhage is in large measure due to reckless government spending. Every dollar spent by Washington is one dollar taken out of our economy that cannot create real prosperity and real jobs.
Republicans must stand against every attempt by President Obama and Nancy Pelosi to use our economic crisis to turn America into a full-blown socialist state. In less than a year, President Obama and the Democrats have effectively taken over our Banking Industry, the Automotive Industry, the Insurance Industry, and now they?re trying to take over the Health Care Industry.
$ Trillions are spent every year running a colossal bureaucracy of alphabet soup agencies, most of which 90 percent of Americans have never heard. The only way to pull the brakes on this runaway train in Washington is to cut off the funds. We don't just need a balanced budget, we need a smaller budget. Cutting taxes is a great idea which I support, but it must be accompanied by heavy cuts in spending. This position is considered political heresy today, but at one time most Republicans were not ashamed to promote it. If we really and truly believe in a Free Market, then we must make it Free again. That necessitates a smaller government?and smaller government means smaller federal budgets.
This is the only way we can return to sustained economic growth instead of the constant boom/bust cycles we have endured since the Great Depression.
Q. Currently we are at war on many fronts. Global terrorism and the threat of our enemies are a harsh reality. What is the proper course America should take on Afghanistan, Iran and North Korea and what specific steps should be taken to ensure that our armed forces have the resources necessary to ensure our national security?
PURCELL: As listed in the United States Constitution, National Defense is the government's primary obligation and responsibility. Our economic crisis demands that our Federal Government prioritize its spending. I will do whatever it takes to make sure our Armed Forces have everything they need to defeat our enemies and defend our borders.
Liberals in Washington seem to be preoccupied with turning our military into a grand experiment in social engineering. Political correctness has no place in our military and if we don't stop it, we'll continue to witness Fort Hood-style tragedies.
Regarding the current state of affairs in Afghanistan; we need to rely on the wisdom and experience of our Generals on the ground. They know what they need to win and we need to provide them with what they need so they can get the job done and bring our troops home.
Regarding Iran's nuclear capability, if -- and only if -- Iran is truly a threat to our country, I would favor strategic missile attacks on nuclear facilities. Regarding North Korea; same policy as Iran.
We have the world's most powerful and best trained military. The primary job of our military is not to spread democracy or distribute foreign aid. There are thousands of non-profit organizations in our country that do a marvelous job spreading our values to the rest of the world. The job of our military is to protect our citizens and whip the tar out of our enemies. I believe we can accomplish this without being a world bully. As Teddy Roosevelt once said, "Speak softly and carry a big stick".
Q. The world-wide economic crisis appears to be exacerbated by problems with the international Banking system and tensions between the industrialized countries and the aspirations of less developed nations. Various proposals have been advanced to address these issues, ranging from the Law of the Sea Treaty recently approved by the U.S. Senate, the Kyoto Treaty and the forthcoming Copenhagen Conference on greenhouse gases and global warming, to the controversial "Cap and Trade" legislation. What are your ideas on how to deal with these concerns?
PURCELL: According to our Constitution, foreign treaties which are signed by our President and ratified by the U.S. Senate are treated as the "Supreme Law of the Land;" that is, if such treaties do not violate the Constitution itself. This part is conveniently forgotten by the environmental lobby; and many activist judges.
The first line of defense against treaties like the "Law of the Sea," which essentially subordinates U.S. interests and law to the United Nations, is our Supreme Court. However, if the Supreme Court refuses to rule such treaties unconstitutional, it is up to Congress to contest it by using its "powers of the purse." The United Nations would be nothing without the funding which comes from the American Taxpayer. American taxpayers should not fund the destruction of their own rights and interests. Congress should de-fund the United Nations and leave the organization all together, if our rights and interests continue to be compromised.
Global warming and climate change is the new religion of the radical Left. The whole issue is not about protecting the environment. It's about control, and protecting the environment is just the pretty wrapping. Republicans in Congress must oppose this radical agenda which sees human beings as a plague on the earth; not as responsible stewards.
Q. The House has just passed the comprehensive health care legislation, including a government option, the senate has yet to act. What are your views on the disadvantages and benefits, if any, of the legislation and is there anything in the current proposals that you could support?
PURCELL: Health insurance is not a right; it's insurance. I support only the kind of health care reform that keeps the tentacles of government meddling as far away as possible. Funny how liberals don't want the government to come "between a woman and her doctor" when it comes to aborting a child (except to pay for the abortion). But when it comes to the government coming between a woman (or man) and their doctor on everything else, liberals like Nancy Pelosi and Bill Foster are all for it.
Federal regulations which limit consumer options on choosing health insurance companies must be repealed. I also support tort reform measures to eliminate "jackpot justice" lawsuits which have driven up health care costs. Doctors need to get back to providing the art and science of quality care. Defensive medicine adds layers of costs and limits access.
No American should be forced to purchase health insurance; especially government provided health insurance. With the proper reforms, health insurance premiums will plummet providing access to those that want coverage.
The very idea of pushing a $1 TRILLION plan on the American people while we're experiencing the worst economic recession since the Great Depression; and record debt and budget deficits is not only irresponsible, it's crazy!
Q. Studies show that Ill. Sends more tax dollars to Washington than it gets back in federal assistance and programs. How important is it for our congressman to fight to get our fair share of those dollars for the 14th District?
PURCELL: The best thing a Republican Congressman can do for his/her constituents to ensure our "fair share" of tax dollars return to Illinois is to fight to keep as much of our money from going to Washington in the first place. As the old saying goes, "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." Congressmen are expected to look at the federal budget as a big apple pie which they have to fight with 434 other eaters for the bigger piece.
It's time to think outside this box. Why should we deal with the middle-man in Washington? If we need to pave a highway, why send $ millions to Washington and then fight to get some of it back? If we want to pave a road, let's pave it. Why send our money to the Federal Department of Transportation? Of course, the hard part is getting from where we are today to where we need to be. But we certainly won't go anywhere if we don?t start addressing these fundamental questions.
Closing Statements: Please tell us why you are the best candidate to beat Congressman Foster.
PURCELL: I believe I am the best candidate to beat Bill Foster because I believe I am the only one willing and ready for the bloody battle that is sure to come following the primary. The Democrats are not going to give this seat up easy. $ Millions will be spent on Chicago television trying to destroy the Republican nominee for this seat.
I believe I am ready to take the punches; but more importantly, I'm ready to give them.
For years, I've helped business owners and operators use their resources more efficiently. In some cases, this involved struggling and failing companies, like our Government. One thing I have learned is that if you're not moving forward, you're automatically falling backwards. Conservatives cannot be content with just "holding our ground." We have to go on the offensive. We cannot simply be content to stop the Democrats. We need to go after the Democrats. We need to put forward our own plans and our own vision for America. And we need to back it up with the courage to see it through.
Republicans lost our majority in Congress because we became part of the problem in Washington. The American people reminded us in 2006 who we are suppose to be working for. I don't believe Democrats won because voters moved Left. I think Democrats won because Republicans lost the confidence of the people who elected them. Republicans in Washington went Left, and they lost. We must get Right again, and we'll win again. I believe I am the only candidate running who understands this and has what it takes to restore the confidence of the Republican voters in the 14th District.
Q. Government spending has reached into the billions of dollars in so-called stimulus, and government bailout, yet unemployment in some Kane County communities is over 12%. Small businesses are having trouble succeeding and homes are still being foreclosed. What do you feel really needs to be done to grow the economy and put America back to work?
PURCELL: Economic growth and government growth are mutually exclusive. The first step in stopping our economic decline is to stop the bleeding. Our economic hemorrhage is in large measure due to reckless government spending. Every dollar spent by Washington is one dollar taken out of our economy that cannot create real prosperity and real jobs.
Republicans must stand against every attempt by President Obama and Nancy Pelosi to use our economic crisis to turn America into a full-blown socialist state. In less than a year, President Obama and the Democrats have effectively taken over our Banking Industry, the Automotive Industry, the Insurance Industry, and now they?re trying to take over the Health Care Industry.
$ Trillions are spent every year running a colossal bureaucracy of alphabet soup agencies, most of which 90 percent of Americans have never heard. The only way to pull the brakes on this runaway train in Washington is to cut off the funds. We don't just need a balanced budget, we need a smaller budget. Cutting taxes is a great idea which I support, but it must be accompanied by heavy cuts in spending. This position is considered political heresy today, but at one time most Republicans were not ashamed to promote it. If we really and truly believe in a Free Market, then we must make it Free again. That necessitates a smaller government?and smaller government means smaller federal budgets.
This is the only way we can return to sustained economic growth instead of the constant boom/bust cycles we have endured since the Great Depression.
Q. Currently we are at war on many fronts. Global terrorism and the threat of our enemies are a harsh reality. What is the proper course America should take on Afghanistan, Iran and North Korea and what specific steps should be taken to ensure that our armed forces have the resources necessary to ensure our national security?
PURCELL: As listed in the United States Constitution, National Defense is the government's primary obligation and responsibility. Our economic crisis demands that our Federal Government prioritize its spending. I will do whatever it takes to make sure our Armed Forces have everything they need to defeat our enemies and defend our borders.
Liberals in Washington seem to be preoccupied with turning our military into a grand experiment in social engineering. Political correctness has no place in our military and if we don't stop it, we'll continue to witness Fort Hood-style tragedies.
Regarding the current state of affairs in Afghanistan; we need to rely on the wisdom and experience of our Generals on the ground. They know what they need to win and we need to provide them with what they need so they can get the job done and bring our troops home.
Regarding Iran's nuclear capability, if -- and only if -- Iran is truly a threat to our country, I would favor strategic missile attacks on nuclear facilities. Regarding North Korea; same policy as Iran.
We have the world's most powerful and best trained military. The primary job of our military is not to spread democracy or distribute foreign aid. There are thousands of non-profit organizations in our country that do a marvelous job spreading our values to the rest of the world. The job of our military is to protect our citizens and whip the tar out of our enemies. I believe we can accomplish this without being a world bully. As Teddy Roosevelt once said, "Speak softly and carry a big stick".
Q. The world-wide economic crisis appears to be exacerbated by problems with the international Banking system and tensions between the industrialized countries and the aspirations of less developed nations. Various proposals have been advanced to address these issues, ranging from the Law of the Sea Treaty recently approved by the U.S. Senate, the Kyoto Treaty and the forthcoming Copenhagen Conference on greenhouse gases and global warming, to the controversial "Cap and Trade" legislation. What are your ideas on how to deal with these concerns?
PURCELL: According to our Constitution, foreign treaties which are signed by our President and ratified by the U.S. Senate are treated as the "Supreme Law of the Land;" that is, if such treaties do not violate the Constitution itself. This part is conveniently forgotten by the environmental lobby; and many activist judges.
The first line of defense against treaties like the "Law of the Sea," which essentially subordinates U.S. interests and law to the United Nations, is our Supreme Court. However, if the Supreme Court refuses to rule such treaties unconstitutional, it is up to Congress to contest it by using its "powers of the purse." The United Nations would be nothing without the funding which comes from the American Taxpayer. American taxpayers should not fund the destruction of their own rights and interests. Congress should de-fund the United Nations and leave the organization all together, if our rights and interests continue to be compromised.
Global warming and climate change is the new religion of the radical Left. The whole issue is not about protecting the environment. It's about control, and protecting the environment is just the pretty wrapping. Republicans in Congress must oppose this radical agenda which sees human beings as a plague on the earth; not as responsible stewards.
Q. The House has just passed the comprehensive health care legislation, including a government option, the senate has yet to act. What are your views on the disadvantages and benefits, if any, of the legislation and is there anything in the current proposals that you could support?
PURCELL: Health insurance is not a right; it's insurance. I support only the kind of health care reform that keeps the tentacles of government meddling as far away as possible. Funny how liberals don't want the government to come "between a woman and her doctor" when it comes to aborting a child (except to pay for the abortion). But when it comes to the government coming between a woman (or man) and their doctor on everything else, liberals like Nancy Pelosi and Bill Foster are all for it.
Federal regulations which limit consumer options on choosing health insurance companies must be repealed. I also support tort reform measures to eliminate "jackpot justice" lawsuits which have driven up health care costs. Doctors need to get back to providing the art and science of quality care. Defensive medicine adds layers of costs and limits access.
No American should be forced to purchase health insurance; especially government provided health insurance. With the proper reforms, health insurance premiums will plummet providing access to those that want coverage.
The very idea of pushing a $1 TRILLION plan on the American people while we're experiencing the worst economic recession since the Great Depression; and record debt and budget deficits is not only irresponsible, it's crazy!
Q. Studies show that Ill. Sends more tax dollars to Washington than it gets back in federal assistance and programs. How important is it for our congressman to fight to get our fair share of those dollars for the 14th District?
PURCELL: The best thing a Republican Congressman can do for his/her constituents to ensure our "fair share" of tax dollars return to Illinois is to fight to keep as much of our money from going to Washington in the first place. As the old saying goes, "An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure." Congressmen are expected to look at the federal budget as a big apple pie which they have to fight with 434 other eaters for the bigger piece.
It's time to think outside this box. Why should we deal with the middle-man in Washington? If we need to pave a highway, why send $ millions to Washington and then fight to get some of it back? If we want to pave a road, let's pave it. Why send our money to the Federal Department of Transportation? Of course, the hard part is getting from where we are today to where we need to be. But we certainly won't go anywhere if we don?t start addressing these fundamental questions.
Closing Statements: Please tell us why you are the best candidate to beat Congressman Foster.
PURCELL: I believe I am the best candidate to beat Bill Foster because I believe I am the only one willing and ready for the bloody battle that is sure to come following the primary. The Democrats are not going to give this seat up easy. $ Millions will be spent on Chicago television trying to destroy the Republican nominee for this seat.
I believe I am ready to take the punches; but more importantly, I'm ready to give them.
For years, I've helped business owners and operators use their resources more efficiently. In some cases, this involved struggling and failing companies, like our Government. One thing I have learned is that if you're not moving forward, you're automatically falling backwards. Conservatives cannot be content with just "holding our ground." We have to go on the offensive. We cannot simply be content to stop the Democrats. We need to go after the Democrats. We need to put forward our own plans and our own vision for America. And we need to back it up with the courage to see it through.
Republicans lost our majority in Congress because we became part of the problem in Washington. The American people reminded us in 2006 who we are suppose to be working for. I don't believe Democrats won because voters moved Left. I think Democrats won because Republicans lost the confidence of the people who elected them. Republicans in Washington went Left, and they lost. We must get Right again, and we'll win again. I believe I am the only candidate running who understands this and has what it takes to restore the confidence of the Republican voters in the 14th District.
Purcell wants to bring business eye to 14th Congressional District
By JAMES FULLER | Daily Herald Staff
As Batavia resident Jim Purcell watched Republican candidates flood into the race to unseat Democrat Bill Foster from the 14th Congressional District seat, he couldn't help but feel a little out of place.
"I quickly realized I didn't see anyone in the field who would fight for my interests," Purcell said.
Purcell has been a Republican as long as he can remember and has volunteered for party activities when he's had the chance, but he's never held elected office.
"I'm 41, married with kids, not tied to any special interests, and I'm not a career politician," Purcell said. "I think I'm pretty typical for the person in the district."
Purcell said he also believes most people in the district are like him in being concerned with the direction of the country regardless of the party making the decisions.
"Both parties have had spending problems," Purcell said. "They have spent money and put us in the ditch. There's blame on both sides."
Purcell said he's not going to pull any punches in the primary or against Foster if and when he makes it through the Republican primary in February. He plans to use the experience interacting with customers as a businessman to create the connection with the voters he believes is key for the race and as an elected official.
"Now is not the time to go along to get along," Purcell said. "If you're a career politician, or new in your business life, you haven't had the experience of sitting with customers and helping them make a decision about what's best for them. As a businessman you get a pretty good feel for what's common sense and not rocket science."
Purcell recognized the rocket science comment as a subtle jab at Foster, who is a physicist by trade.
Voters will get a chance to see more of that personality firsthand when local Republicans host a candidates forum at 2 p.m. Sunday at the Eagle Brook Country Club in Geneva. Purcell will be joined by the four other Republican candidates: Jeff Danklefsen, Ethan Hastert, Randy Hultgren and Mark Vargas.
Foster's lone Democratic challenger, Jim Pistorius of Aurora, withdrew Thursday, according to the state board of elections.
There is also a Green Party candidate running for the seat, Daniel Kairis of South Elgin.
As Batavia resident Jim Purcell watched Republican candidates flood into the race to unseat Democrat Bill Foster from the 14th Congressional District seat, he couldn't help but feel a little out of place.
"I quickly realized I didn't see anyone in the field who would fight for my interests," Purcell said.
Purcell has been a Republican as long as he can remember and has volunteered for party activities when he's had the chance, but he's never held elected office.
"I'm 41, married with kids, not tied to any special interests, and I'm not a career politician," Purcell said. "I think I'm pretty typical for the person in the district."
Purcell said he also believes most people in the district are like him in being concerned with the direction of the country regardless of the party making the decisions.
"Both parties have had spending problems," Purcell said. "They have spent money and put us in the ditch. There's blame on both sides."
Purcell said he's not going to pull any punches in the primary or against Foster if and when he makes it through the Republican primary in February. He plans to use the experience interacting with customers as a businessman to create the connection with the voters he believes is key for the race and as an elected official.
"Now is not the time to go along to get along," Purcell said. "If you're a career politician, or new in your business life, you haven't had the experience of sitting with customers and helping them make a decision about what's best for them. As a businessman you get a pretty good feel for what's common sense and not rocket science."
Purcell recognized the rocket science comment as a subtle jab at Foster, who is a physicist by trade.
Voters will get a chance to see more of that personality firsthand when local Republicans host a candidates forum at 2 p.m. Sunday at the Eagle Brook Country Club in Geneva. Purcell will be joined by the four other Republican candidates: Jeff Danklefsen, Ethan Hastert, Randy Hultgren and Mark Vargas.
Foster's lone Democratic challenger, Jim Pistorius of Aurora, withdrew Thursday, according to the state board of elections.
There is also a Green Party candidate running for the seat, Daniel Kairis of South Elgin.
Federal Deficit Hits October Record of $176 Billion
By MATTHEW JAFFE - Nov. 12, 2009
The U.S. budget deficit for October surged to $176 billion, a record for the month, the Treasury Department announced today.
During the month, the government racked up $311 billion in outlays compared with $135 billion in receipts.
The October numbers mark the first month for the new fiscal year after the U.S. wrapped up the 2009 fiscal year that ended on September 30 with a record-high $1.4 trillion budget deficit due to increased government spending to stop the recession and the financial crisis. The final deficit for the 2009 fiscal year was equal to 10 percent of the nation's GDP, the highest shortfall relative to GDP since 1945, the final year of World War II.
The rising deficit has caused some concerns in Asia, where President Obama is set to start a weeklong trip. On his visit to the Pacific Rim the president will visit the United States' two largest foreign creditors – China and Japan.
In recent months the country's soaring deficit has prompted fears that China and Japan might reduce their holdings of treasuries, but neither country has shown signs of a drawdown. The most recent numbers revealed that during August China decreased its holdings by $3 billion to $797 billion, while Japan raised its holdings by $6.5 billion to $731 billion.
Along with his stops in China and Japan the president will also visit Singapore and South Korea -- the four countries combined own 47 percent of America's foreign-held debt.
In an interview with CNBC conducted at the APEC summit in Singapore, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner vowed that the United States' fiscal situation will improve as the economy does so, too.
The U.S. budget deficit for October surged to $176 billion, a record for the month, the Treasury Department announced today.
During the month, the government racked up $311 billion in outlays compared with $135 billion in receipts.
The October numbers mark the first month for the new fiscal year after the U.S. wrapped up the 2009 fiscal year that ended on September 30 with a record-high $1.4 trillion budget deficit due to increased government spending to stop the recession and the financial crisis. The final deficit for the 2009 fiscal year was equal to 10 percent of the nation's GDP, the highest shortfall relative to GDP since 1945, the final year of World War II.
The rising deficit has caused some concerns in Asia, where President Obama is set to start a weeklong trip. On his visit to the Pacific Rim the president will visit the United States' two largest foreign creditors – China and Japan.
In recent months the country's soaring deficit has prompted fears that China and Japan might reduce their holdings of treasuries, but neither country has shown signs of a drawdown. The most recent numbers revealed that during August China decreased its holdings by $3 billion to $797 billion, while Japan raised its holdings by $6.5 billion to $731 billion.
Along with his stops in China and Japan the president will also visit Singapore and South Korea -- the four countries combined own 47 percent of America's foreign-held debt.
In an interview with CNBC conducted at the APEC summit in Singapore, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner vowed that the United States' fiscal situation will improve as the economy does so, too.
Batavia man joins GOP race
BY HAL CONICK
St. Charles, IL -
Even with the large slate of people running on the Republican side of the 14th District Congressional race, Jim Purcell didn’t think any of the candidates were for him.
“I didn’t feel like the candidates reflected the fight for me, my neighbors and for my friends,” Purcell said. So Purcell decided to take the run at office himself.
A Batavia resident and father of three children, Purcell, 41, said his 20 years of experience as a business owner and consultant will help him in his bid for office.
“There’s a big difference between being a career politician and working for constituents,” Purcell said. “I’ve worked with hundreds and thousands of customers over my business career in public and private companies, seeing what their issues are. ... I’m not tied to any special interest.”
Purcell said the biggest issue he sees in the 14th District is jobs and how to create more.
“Small and mid-sized businesses create 80 percent of the revenue (in America),” Purcell said. “Yet we continue to choke the golden goose that creates that revenue.”
Purcell said he wants to see less taxes on small business, including eliminating certain mandates in the health care bill passed by the House of Representatives over the weekend.
“Continuing taxes and fees on a wounded group doesn’t make a lot of sense to me,” Purcell said.
The incumbent, U.S. Rep. Bill Foster, D-14th District, of Geneva, voted to pass the Affordable Health Care for America Act. Foster has said he will run for reelection.
Purcell will take on Mark Vargas of Elgin, Jeff Danklefsen of Geneva, Ethan Hastert of Elburn and State Sen. Randy Hultgren, R-48th District, of Wheaton, in the Republican primary Feb. 2. The general election will be Nov. 2, 2010.
Purcell said while he’s met all of his opponents and thinks they each have a unique background, he doesn’t think any of them are the man for the job.
“We’ve got a unique set of circumstances. The country is at a tricky spot right now. I’m not sure it’s time for a career politician or a famous name to represent us,” Purcell said. “The time is right to not serve special interest and recycled career politicians. We’ve got to take on both parties and their out-of-control spending. I’m not tied to that past history.”
Purcell said he has been extremely disappointed in Foster’s time as the 14th District’s representative.
“He (was moderate) to get elected,” Purcell said. “There was a lot of frustration with the Republicans at the time. He immediately (became more liberal). ... I’m very disappointed in a district like ours that he’s left us.”
St. Charles, IL -
Even with the large slate of people running on the Republican side of the 14th District Congressional race, Jim Purcell didn’t think any of the candidates were for him.
“I didn’t feel like the candidates reflected the fight for me, my neighbors and for my friends,” Purcell said. So Purcell decided to take the run at office himself.
A Batavia resident and father of three children, Purcell, 41, said his 20 years of experience as a business owner and consultant will help him in his bid for office.
“There’s a big difference between being a career politician and working for constituents,” Purcell said. “I’ve worked with hundreds and thousands of customers over my business career in public and private companies, seeing what their issues are. ... I’m not tied to any special interest.”
Purcell said the biggest issue he sees in the 14th District is jobs and how to create more.
“Small and mid-sized businesses create 80 percent of the revenue (in America),” Purcell said. “Yet we continue to choke the golden goose that creates that revenue.”
Purcell said he wants to see less taxes on small business, including eliminating certain mandates in the health care bill passed by the House of Representatives over the weekend.
“Continuing taxes and fees on a wounded group doesn’t make a lot of sense to me,” Purcell said.
The incumbent, U.S. Rep. Bill Foster, D-14th District, of Geneva, voted to pass the Affordable Health Care for America Act. Foster has said he will run for reelection.
Purcell will take on Mark Vargas of Elgin, Jeff Danklefsen of Geneva, Ethan Hastert of Elburn and State Sen. Randy Hultgren, R-48th District, of Wheaton, in the Republican primary Feb. 2. The general election will be Nov. 2, 2010.
Purcell said while he’s met all of his opponents and thinks they each have a unique background, he doesn’t think any of them are the man for the job.
“We’ve got a unique set of circumstances. The country is at a tricky spot right now. I’m not sure it’s time for a career politician or a famous name to represent us,” Purcell said. “The time is right to not serve special interest and recycled career politicians. We’ve got to take on both parties and their out-of-control spending. I’m not tied to that past history.”
Purcell said he has been extremely disappointed in Foster’s time as the 14th District’s representative.
“He (was moderate) to get elected,” Purcell said. “There was a lot of frustration with the Republicans at the time. He immediately (became more liberal). ... I’m very disappointed in a district like ours that he’s left us.”
One candidate's attempt to clear up Pat Brady's confusion
BY JOHN BIVER
My colleague Doug Ibendahl posted a great article yesterday outlining the embarrassingly transparent attempt by GOP state chair Pat Brady to protect many of the lousy old-guard sponsored candidates appearing on the February 2nd primary ballot.
If you haven't read the piece yet - I couldn't recommend it more - Doug draws it out in strong and plain terms. Doug speculated on who Brady might be attempting to protect:
"My guess would be that at a minimum, Brady will seek to squash real debate in the race for Governor and U.S. Senate. But I would expect that Brady also has orders to protect Dennis Hastert's offspring. Ethan Hastert has very stiff competition in the primary for U.S. Congress in the 14th District (the nominee will face incumbent Democrat Bill Foster)."
The sad fact is that Pat Brady's name was listed as a co-sponsor for a recent event for young Hastert. As Champion News has been saying for a long time, the misuse of the state GOP and Party Chairmanship is a continuing scandal in Illinois. Brady has no business endorsing any candidates in the primary. If he wants to do that, he should resign. Actually, since he still holds the National Committeeman spot, he should resign that office too.
If you wonder why this state is in such a mess and the Illinois Republican Party is such a joke, you need no bigger example than Pat Brady's antics as reported on by Doug Ibendahl.
Doug writes -
Yesterday, Republican Jim Purcell, who is running in the 14th Congressional district primary (along with young Hastert) sent out a press release addressing the state party chairman directly. For those of us who have been waiting for years to see some leadership from our candidates and elected officials, Purcell's statement was very welcome.
My colleague Doug Ibendahl posted a great article yesterday outlining the embarrassingly transparent attempt by GOP state chair Pat Brady to protect many of the lousy old-guard sponsored candidates appearing on the February 2nd primary ballot.
If you haven't read the piece yet - I couldn't recommend it more - Doug draws it out in strong and plain terms. Doug speculated on who Brady might be attempting to protect:
"My guess would be that at a minimum, Brady will seek to squash real debate in the race for Governor and U.S. Senate. But I would expect that Brady also has orders to protect Dennis Hastert's offspring. Ethan Hastert has very stiff competition in the primary for U.S. Congress in the 14th District (the nominee will face incumbent Democrat Bill Foster)."
The sad fact is that Pat Brady's name was listed as a co-sponsor for a recent event for young Hastert. As Champion News has been saying for a long time, the misuse of the state GOP and Party Chairmanship is a continuing scandal in Illinois. Brady has no business endorsing any candidates in the primary. If he wants to do that, he should resign. Actually, since he still holds the National Committeeman spot, he should resign that office too.
If you wonder why this state is in such a mess and the Illinois Republican Party is such a joke, you need no bigger example than Pat Brady's antics as reported on by Doug Ibendahl.
Doug writes -
"Here's my free unsolicited advice to every Republican candidate running against one of the Old Guard's puppets: wake up."The good news is that at least one Republican candidate isn't going to stay silent while the Party is misused. His press release - posted here- is a good first salvo and a wake up call for other candidates to follow his lead. The truth is that many of the reformers on the ballot will find themselves running not just against their opponent(s), but also against the resources of the State GOP.
Yesterday, Republican Jim Purcell, who is running in the 14th Congressional district primary (along with young Hastert) sent out a press release addressing the state party chairman directly. For those of us who have been waiting for years to see some leadership from our candidates and elected officials, Purcell's statement was very welcome.
PURCELL: "BRING IT ON!"
MONDAY, NOVEMBER 9th, 2009
Republican Congressional Candidate Urges Primary Opponents to “throw their best shots at me.”
BATAVIA -- While some politicians decry negative campaign attacks, one Republican running is actually urging his primary opponents to throw their best punches at him.
Local business owner, Jim Purcell, one of several Republicans seeking to topple Congressman Bill Foster next November, disagrees with GOP state chair Pat Brady that Republicans are hurt by negative ads in primaries.
“With all due respect, I disagree with Chairman Brady,” Purcell said at a news conference outside Congressman Foster’s office. “Bill Foster, Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama are going to spend millions and millions of dollars on Chicago TV tearing the lungs out of anyone who’s the GOP nominee for Congress in this district, and we’d better nominate a candidate who can take the punches.”
“I hope my opponents throw their best shots at me,” Purcell said. “Any candidate who can’t take punches from a fellow Republican will never survive when the Obama-Pelosi-Foster Smear Machine unloads on the air next Fall.”
Purcell said he was ready for the battle and welcomes a vigorous primary.
“I’m a big boy and I don’t need Chairman Brady looking out for me,” Purcell added. “There’s a lot at stake in our country and Republicans cannot afford to lose this seat once more. That means Republicans need to mix it up in the primary, get all the issues out and may the best candidate win because the Democrats aren’t giving this seat up without a fight.”
Purcell did point out the difference between a spirited debate or disagreement on issues and personal attacks. He said that, in the end, voters should be the ones to determine when candidates “cross the line.”
“A spirited primary is the way we condition our candidates and our party for the long battle ahead. I say, ‘Bring It On.'"
Republican Congressional Candidate Urges Primary Opponents to “throw their best shots at me.”
BATAVIA -- While some politicians decry negative campaign attacks, one Republican running is actually urging his primary opponents to throw their best punches at him.
Local business owner, Jim Purcell, one of several Republicans seeking to topple Congressman Bill Foster next November, disagrees with GOP state chair Pat Brady that Republicans are hurt by negative ads in primaries.
“With all due respect, I disagree with Chairman Brady,” Purcell said at a news conference outside Congressman Foster’s office. “Bill Foster, Nancy Pelosi and Barack Obama are going to spend millions and millions of dollars on Chicago TV tearing the lungs out of anyone who’s the GOP nominee for Congress in this district, and we’d better nominate a candidate who can take the punches.”
“I hope my opponents throw their best shots at me,” Purcell said. “Any candidate who can’t take punches from a fellow Republican will never survive when the Obama-Pelosi-Foster Smear Machine unloads on the air next Fall.”
Purcell said he was ready for the battle and welcomes a vigorous primary.
“I’m a big boy and I don’t need Chairman Brady looking out for me,” Purcell added. “There’s a lot at stake in our country and Republicans cannot afford to lose this seat once more. That means Republicans need to mix it up in the primary, get all the issues out and may the best candidate win because the Democrats aren’t giving this seat up without a fight.”
Purcell did point out the difference between a spirited debate or disagreement on issues and personal attacks. He said that, in the end, voters should be the ones to determine when candidates “cross the line.”
“A spirited primary is the way we condition our candidates and our party for the long battle ahead. I say, ‘Bring It On.'"
PURCELL: FOSTER’S VOTE FOR SOCIALIZED MEDICINE WILL COST HIM HIS SEAT
SUNDAY, NOVEMBER 8th, 2009
BATAVIA -- Republican Jim Purcell, one of five GOPers seeking to topple liberal Democratic Congressman Bill Foster next November, said that Foster’s vote for the Obama-Reid-Pelosi Socialized Medicine law will cost him his seat.
“Congressman Foster last night took the side of Barack Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi in favor of Socialized Medicine and I predict that vote will cost him his seat,” Purcell said. “I’m running for Congress to provide a clear contrast for voters fed up with Bill Foster’s left-wing Socialist viewpoint.”
Purcell said he’s the strongest candidate to run against Foster.
“Republicans aren’t going to win with a famous name or a career politician with a history of raising taxes,” Purcell said. “I’m just a hard-working taxpayer fed up with the direction our country is taking and I’m taking on Bill Foster to do something about it. That’s why I’m in this race and I intend to win it.”
“Bill Foster has stood shoulder to shoulder with Barack Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi in their assault on taxpayers and working families everywhere,” Purcell said. “He supported their bailouts, their ‘cash for clunkers’ scams, and their stimulus schemes. Now he’s supporting their plan to Socialize one-sixth of the economy through the Obamacare proposal. Bill Foster is one liberal mistake that needs to be corrected as soon as possible.”
“This is not a campaign to take back one seat in Congress; it’s not about the Red Team beating the Blue Team. This is about taking back our country. That’s what this election is all about."
BATAVIA -- Republican Jim Purcell, one of five GOPers seeking to topple liberal Democratic Congressman Bill Foster next November, said that Foster’s vote for the Obama-Reid-Pelosi Socialized Medicine law will cost him his seat.
“Congressman Foster last night took the side of Barack Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi in favor of Socialized Medicine and I predict that vote will cost him his seat,” Purcell said. “I’m running for Congress to provide a clear contrast for voters fed up with Bill Foster’s left-wing Socialist viewpoint.”
Purcell said he’s the strongest candidate to run against Foster.
“Republicans aren’t going to win with a famous name or a career politician with a history of raising taxes,” Purcell said. “I’m just a hard-working taxpayer fed up with the direction our country is taking and I’m taking on Bill Foster to do something about it. That’s why I’m in this race and I intend to win it.”
“Bill Foster has stood shoulder to shoulder with Barack Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi in their assault on taxpayers and working families everywhere,” Purcell said. “He supported their bailouts, their ‘cash for clunkers’ scams, and their stimulus schemes. Now he’s supporting their plan to Socialize one-sixth of the economy through the Obamacare proposal. Bill Foster is one liberal mistake that needs to be corrected as soon as possible.”
“This is not a campaign to take back one seat in Congress; it’s not about the Red Team beating the Blue Team. This is about taking back our country. That’s what this election is all about."
Purcell files to form congressional campaign committee
BY JONATHAN BILYK
BATAVIA — A local businessman has officially filed to run for Congress.
Thursday, Jim Purcell, of Batavia, announced that he has become the latest candidate to officially seek to place his name on the ballot in the race for the Republican nomination in Illinois' 14th Congressional District.
In an emailed announcement, Purcell said he had filed the paperwork with the Federal Election Commission that is needed to form a campaign committee.
He also announced that he had launched his campaign's Web site.
Purcell is the latest in a series of local Republicans to step forward to seek their party's nod to take on incumbent U.S. Rep. Bill Foster, D-Batavia, in the fall of 2010.
Purcell is opposed by Ethan Hastert, of Elburn, a lawyer and son of former U.S. Speaker of the House J. Dennis Hastert; State Sen. Randy Hultgren, R-Wheaton; Mark Vargas, of Elgin, a Defense Department employee who was awarded a medal for his work on rebuilding the economy of Iraq; and Jeff Danklefsen, of Geneva, a maintenance manager for a St. Charles property management company and a local Tea Party activist.
Purcell called attention to his 20-year career in both private and public business, including serving from 2000 to 2006 as vice president and general manager of a cleaning company based in Bloomington.
He relocated with his family to Batavia in mid-2007 and now operates Shamrock Group Investments, a consulting business specializing in helping struggling companies turn around and grow.
He said he has entered the race to offer Republican voters a real alternative to the field as it then existed.
"I was looking at this throughout the summer, and I still felt that, as nice of guys as the field is, it just wasn't enough," Purcell said.
He said his career in business would be what the district needs to be represented properly in Congress.
"Both parties have put us in the predicament we're in now," he said.
He acknowledged that he has entered the race relatively late, and faces a struggle to catch up to other, more entrenched candidates.
But he said he believes his candidacy is "right there" and there is still enough time before the February 2010 primary election to pull even.
BATAVIA — A local businessman has officially filed to run for Congress.
Thursday, Jim Purcell, of Batavia, announced that he has become the latest candidate to officially seek to place his name on the ballot in the race for the Republican nomination in Illinois' 14th Congressional District.
In an emailed announcement, Purcell said he had filed the paperwork with the Federal Election Commission that is needed to form a campaign committee.
He also announced that he had launched his campaign's Web site.
Purcell is the latest in a series of local Republicans to step forward to seek their party's nod to take on incumbent U.S. Rep. Bill Foster, D-Batavia, in the fall of 2010.
Purcell is opposed by Ethan Hastert, of Elburn, a lawyer and son of former U.S. Speaker of the House J. Dennis Hastert; State Sen. Randy Hultgren, R-Wheaton; Mark Vargas, of Elgin, a Defense Department employee who was awarded a medal for his work on rebuilding the economy of Iraq; and Jeff Danklefsen, of Geneva, a maintenance manager for a St. Charles property management company and a local Tea Party activist.
Purcell called attention to his 20-year career in both private and public business, including serving from 2000 to 2006 as vice president and general manager of a cleaning company based in Bloomington.
He relocated with his family to Batavia in mid-2007 and now operates Shamrock Group Investments, a consulting business specializing in helping struggling companies turn around and grow.
He said he has entered the race to offer Republican voters a real alternative to the field as it then existed.
"I was looking at this throughout the summer, and I still felt that, as nice of guys as the field is, it just wasn't enough," Purcell said.
He said his career in business would be what the district needs to be represented properly in Congress.
"Both parties have put us in the predicament we're in now," he said.
He acknowledged that he has entered the race relatively late, and faces a struggle to catch up to other, more entrenched candidates.
But he said he believes his candidacy is "right there" and there is still enough time before the February 2010 primary election to pull even.
Bush, Sessions talk tort reform at ILR Summit
BY JOHN O'BRIEN
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline) - Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions highlighted the speakers at the 10th U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform Summit, held Wednesday.
Bush spoke to the role of tort reform in reshaping Florida's economy, while Sessions touched on medical malpractice reform's role in a new health care system. Sessions is the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee and former attorney general of Alabama.
"Medical malpractice reform is a major issue for the health care debate," Sessions said. "I think medical malpractice reform should certainly be a part of any health care Congressional action."
Medical malpractice insurance and defensive medicine practices have been blamed for increased costs and reduced care.
A 2005 survey published in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicated that 93 percent of doctors say they have practiced defensive medicine, where they perform unnecessary tests and procedures to protect them from possible civil action, so not to get caught up in a medical malpractice claim.
The American Association for Justice, formerly the American Trial Lawyers Association, started a campaign in September it said would educate lawmakers about the preventable medical errors and how tort reform won't lower costs or cover the uninsured.
Howard Dean -- a former Presidential candidate, chairman of the Democratic National Committee and physician -- said at a town hall meeting in August that lawmakers are scared of upsetting trial lawyers.
"When you go to pass a really enormous bill like that, the more stuff you put in it, the more enemies you make," Dean said.
"And the reason tort reform is not in the bill is because the people who wrote it did not want to take on the trial lawyers in addition to everybody else they were taking on, and that is the plain and simple truth."
Sessions noted that President Barack Obama had said that tort reform will not be discussed as part of the health care package. Obama has since backed off those comments and admitted something should be done about defensive medicine.
"This is one step that should never be left out," Sessions said.
Meanwhile, Bush relived his own experiences with tort reform, as he started battling the plaintiffs bar after he was elected governor in 1998.
"We beat them most of the time, not all of the time, but most of the time," he said. "I loved it. I had a good time. I love a good fight."
Bush said medical malpractice reforms enacted while he was in office -- like caps on noneconomic damages -- have begun to bear fruit.
"Medical malpractice occurred after... six special sessions in one year, but we got it done and now we're seeing declines in claims and insurance premiums for doctors," Bush said.
The doctrine of joint and several liability was also scrapped while Bush was in office.
Bush also had harsh words for Obama in response to a question from the audience.
"I think President Obama has used the bully pulpit as a way to attack capitalism," he said.
After a pause, he concluded, "That'll make the news."
ILR President Lisa Rickard presented Sessions with the ILR's 2009 Legislative Achievement Award for his efforts in the civil justice reform area.
The State Leadership Award was given to the State Chamber of Oklahoma which helped with the passage of the Comprehensive Lawsuit Reform Act of 2009.
The Searle Civil Justice Institute at Northwestern University School of Law was given the Research Award for its report, Consumer Arbitration Before the American Arbitration Association.
Former Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Ruth McGregor was given the Judicial Achievement Award for promoting public participation and transparency in the judicial selection process.
From Legal Newsline: Reach John O'Brien by e-mail at jobrienwv@gmail.com. Legal Newsline is owned by the ILR.
WASHINGTON (Legal Newsline) - Former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and U.S. Sen. Jeff Sessions highlighted the speakers at the 10th U.S. Chamber Institute for Legal Reform Summit, held Wednesday.
Bush spoke to the role of tort reform in reshaping Florida's economy, while Sessions touched on medical malpractice reform's role in a new health care system. Sessions is the ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee and former attorney general of Alabama.
"Medical malpractice reform is a major issue for the health care debate," Sessions said. "I think medical malpractice reform should certainly be a part of any health care Congressional action."
Medical malpractice insurance and defensive medicine practices have been blamed for increased costs and reduced care.
A 2005 survey published in the Journal of the American Medical Association indicated that 93 percent of doctors say they have practiced defensive medicine, where they perform unnecessary tests and procedures to protect them from possible civil action, so not to get caught up in a medical malpractice claim.
The American Association for Justice, formerly the American Trial Lawyers Association, started a campaign in September it said would educate lawmakers about the preventable medical errors and how tort reform won't lower costs or cover the uninsured.
Howard Dean -- a former Presidential candidate, chairman of the Democratic National Committee and physician -- said at a town hall meeting in August that lawmakers are scared of upsetting trial lawyers.
"When you go to pass a really enormous bill like that, the more stuff you put in it, the more enemies you make," Dean said.
"And the reason tort reform is not in the bill is because the people who wrote it did not want to take on the trial lawyers in addition to everybody else they were taking on, and that is the plain and simple truth."
Sessions noted that President Barack Obama had said that tort reform will not be discussed as part of the health care package. Obama has since backed off those comments and admitted something should be done about defensive medicine.
"This is one step that should never be left out," Sessions said.
Meanwhile, Bush relived his own experiences with tort reform, as he started battling the plaintiffs bar after he was elected governor in 1998.
"We beat them most of the time, not all of the time, but most of the time," he said. "I loved it. I had a good time. I love a good fight."
Bush said medical malpractice reforms enacted while he was in office -- like caps on noneconomic damages -- have begun to bear fruit.
"Medical malpractice occurred after... six special sessions in one year, but we got it done and now we're seeing declines in claims and insurance premiums for doctors," Bush said.
The doctrine of joint and several liability was also scrapped while Bush was in office.
Bush also had harsh words for Obama in response to a question from the audience.
"I think President Obama has used the bully pulpit as a way to attack capitalism," he said.
After a pause, he concluded, "That'll make the news."
ILR President Lisa Rickard presented Sessions with the ILR's 2009 Legislative Achievement Award for his efforts in the civil justice reform area.
The State Leadership Award was given to the State Chamber of Oklahoma which helped with the passage of the Comprehensive Lawsuit Reform Act of 2009.
The Searle Civil Justice Institute at Northwestern University School of Law was given the Research Award for its report, Consumer Arbitration Before the American Arbitration Association.
Former Arizona Supreme Court Chief Justice Ruth McGregor was given the Judicial Achievement Award for promoting public participation and transparency in the judicial selection process.
From Legal Newsline: Reach John O'Brien by e-mail at jobrienwv@gmail.com. Legal Newsline is owned by the ILR.
Jim Purcell Launches Congressional Campaign Website
14th Congressional District candidate also files formal FEC paperwork, Statement of Candidacy
BATAVIA, IL – Jim Purcell, candidate for Congress in Illinois’ 14th Congressional District, announced today the launch of his campaign website at www.purcellforcongress.com. He also officially filed paperwork this week with the Federal Election Commission to form his campaign committee.
Purcell has assembled a strong campaign team of seasoned leaders and professionals needed to win in 2010.
“I am grateful and humbled by the outpouring of support for my campaign from the residents of the 14th Congressional District,” said Purcell. “After traveling the district for several months, I am convinced now is the time for a new class of principled leaders in Washington – leaders who will stand boldly for the values upon which our nation was built.”
While President Obama and the Congressional Democrats have appropriately received their fair share of criticism, Purcell recognizes many Republicans in Congress are also to blame for the state we find our government today.
“Officials in Washington from both political parties have lost touch with the fundamental principles that most Americans live their lives by every day - common sense, fiscal responsibility, and the traditional moral values and respect for individual freedoms that built this nation,” Purcell said.
Purcell will bring a real-world perspective to Washington and utilize his experience as a small business owner to offer a fresh, practical, solutions-oriented perspective to the challenges facing our community and country today.
“Most politicians have neither signed the front of a check nor had to sweat to make a payroll – I have,” said Purcell.
If you would like more information, or to schedule an interview with Jim Purcell, please call Jennifer Baty at (630) 457-1010 or email Jennifer at info@purcellforcongress.com.
BATAVIA, IL – Jim Purcell, candidate for Congress in Illinois’ 14th Congressional District, announced today the launch of his campaign website at www.purcellforcongress.com. He also officially filed paperwork this week with the Federal Election Commission to form his campaign committee.
Purcell has assembled a strong campaign team of seasoned leaders and professionals needed to win in 2010.
“I am grateful and humbled by the outpouring of support for my campaign from the residents of the 14th Congressional District,” said Purcell. “After traveling the district for several months, I am convinced now is the time for a new class of principled leaders in Washington – leaders who will stand boldly for the values upon which our nation was built.”
While President Obama and the Congressional Democrats have appropriately received their fair share of criticism, Purcell recognizes many Republicans in Congress are also to blame for the state we find our government today.
“Officials in Washington from both political parties have lost touch with the fundamental principles that most Americans live their lives by every day - common sense, fiscal responsibility, and the traditional moral values and respect for individual freedoms that built this nation,” Purcell said.
Purcell will bring a real-world perspective to Washington and utilize his experience as a small business owner to offer a fresh, practical, solutions-oriented perspective to the challenges facing our community and country today.
“Most politicians have neither signed the front of a check nor had to sweat to make a payroll – I have,” said Purcell.
If you would like more information, or to schedule an interview with Jim Purcell, please call Jennifer Baty at (630) 457-1010 or email Jennifer at info@purcellforcongress.com.
The 'bipartisan' big-government health plan*
October 15, 2009
Earlier this week, the Senate Finance Committee passed the health care proposal championed by Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT). The 14-9 vote reflects a strong partisan split: Maine's Olympia Snowe was the only Republican to vote for the measure. Nonetheless, the Left now claims the vote as a "high water mark for 'bipartisanship' in health care reform."
The nine dissenting Republicans on the committee argued, correctly, that the Baucus bill raises taxes and paves the way for a Washington takeover of the health care industry.
These "details" will likely include elements common to the Left's various proposals:
Each of the health care reform proposals Congress is considering, including the supposedly bipartisan Baucus bill, contain these "details." And the cost of these programs is staggering -- and the Congressional Budget Office "estimates are all subject to substantial uncertainty." However, one certainty is that the Baucus bill's estimates will likely increase once it is merged with the other, much costlier proposals.
Though proponents of the Baucus bill may tout bipartisanship and "continue to insist that they are not attempting a Washington takeover of health care," however "their claims fly in the face of the facts." It is still a partisan mess -- and bad policy to boot.
*October 9, 2009, The Heritage Foundation�
Earlier this week, the Senate Finance Committee passed the health care proposal championed by Sen. Max Baucus (D-MT). The 14-9 vote reflects a strong partisan split: Maine's Olympia Snowe was the only Republican to vote for the measure. Nonetheless, the Left now claims the vote as a "high water mark for 'bipartisanship' in health care reform."
The nine dissenting Republicans on the committee argued, correctly, that the Baucus bill raises taxes and paves the way for a Washington takeover of the health care industry.
These "details" will likely include elements common to the Left's various proposals:
- A hefty price tag that will sharply increase federal spending -- meaning more taxes -- and add to the already ballooning deficit, while still leaving millions uninsured;
- A government-run health care "public option" or "co-op" that millions of Americans will be forced to choose over their private health care plans;
- An employer mandate ordering all employers to provide government-approved coverage for all of their employees or else face a harsh penalty tax. This will "result in lower wages, fewer jobs and slower economic growth";
- An individual mandate that will, for the first time in U.S. history, force Americans to purchase federally-designed health care packages, whether they want them or not;
- An expansion of Medicaid, increasing the number of people dependent on this poorly performing entitlement program; and
- A steep cut to Medicare spending to pay for it all -- a cut that will likely never come to fruition once special-interest lobbying groups step in to oppose them. Heritage's Bob Moffit points out that "Congress has a long and uncomplicated history of restoring the cuts it makes to Medicare."
Each of the health care reform proposals Congress is considering, including the supposedly bipartisan Baucus bill, contain these "details." And the cost of these programs is staggering -- and the Congressional Budget Office "estimates are all subject to substantial uncertainty." However, one certainty is that the Baucus bill's estimates will likely increase once it is merged with the other, much costlier proposals.
Though proponents of the Baucus bill may tout bipartisanship and "continue to insist that they are not attempting a Washington takeover of health care," however "their claims fly in the face of the facts." It is still a partisan mess -- and bad policy to boot.
*October 9, 2009, The Heritage Foundation�
American Idea
Walter E. Williams
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Americans are harder workers, more philanthropic, individualistic, self-reliant, anti-government than people in most other countries. We’ve turned what was an 18th-century Third World nation into the freest and most prosperous nation in mankind’s entire history. Throughout our history, United States has been a magnet for immigrants around the world. What accounts for what some have called American exceptionalism?
We Americans, as human beings, are no different from any other people, including Germans, Russians, Chinese, Africans and other people who have produced tyrannical regimes such as those of Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Idi Amin. As such we are just as capable of committing acts of gross evil that have been a part of mankind throughout his history. We’ve not been a perfect nation but we’ve never approached the level of hideousness seen in other nations. That’s despite the fact that our population consists of people who have for centuries been trying to slaughter one another in their home countries, whether it’s between the French and Germans, English and Irish, Japanese and Chinese, or Palestinians and Jews, Igbos and the Hausa of Nigeria. Thrown into the American mosaic are religions that have been in conflict for centuries such as Catholic and Protestant, and Christian and Muslim. The question is: Why is the United States an exception and will it remain so?
At the heart of the American idea is the deep distrust and suspicion the founders of our nation had for government, distrust and suspicion not shared as much by today’s Americans. Some of the founders’ distrust is seen in our Constitution’s language such as Congress shall not: abridge, infringe, deny, disparage, violate and deny. If the founders did not believe Congress would abuse our God-given rights, they would not have provided those protections. After all, one would not expect to find a Bill of Rights in Heaven; it would be an affront to God. Other founder distrust for government is found in the Constitution’s separation of powers, checks and balances and the several anti-majoritarian provisions such as the Electoral College and the requirement that three-quarters of state legislatures ratify changes in the Constitution.
The three branches of our federal government are no longer bound by the Constitution as the framers envisioned and what is worse is American ignorance and acceptance of such rogue behavior. Look at the current debate over government involvement in health, business bailouts and stimulus packages. The debate centers around questions as whether such involvement is a good idea or a bad idea and whether one program is more costly than another. Those questions are entirely irrelevant to what should be debated, namely: Is such government involvement in our lives permissible under the U.S. Constitution?
That question is not part of the debate. The American people, along with our elected representatives, whether they’re Republicans or Democrats, care less about what is and what is not permissible under our Constitution. They think Congress has the right to do anything upon which they can secure a majority vote, whether they have the constitutional or moral authority to do so or not. What Congress does have is the brute force to enforce compliance with their unconstitutional acts. You say, "What do you mean, Williams?" Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution grants Congress the power to tax and spend for the enumerated activities therein. Every American is duty bound to pay his share. Congress has neither constitution nor moral authority to take the earnings of one American for the benefit of another American. What do you think will happen to you if don’t comply, say with Congress' demand that part of your earnings be taken to bail out a failing business? You’ll see all the brute force that you want to see and if you resist too much, death is not off the table.
We are losing what’s made our country great. Instead of moving toward greater liberty, we’re moving toward greater government control of our lives.�
Wednesday, October 21, 2009
Americans are harder workers, more philanthropic, individualistic, self-reliant, anti-government than people in most other countries. We’ve turned what was an 18th-century Third World nation into the freest and most prosperous nation in mankind’s entire history. Throughout our history, United States has been a magnet for immigrants around the world. What accounts for what some have called American exceptionalism?
We Americans, as human beings, are no different from any other people, including Germans, Russians, Chinese, Africans and other people who have produced tyrannical regimes such as those of Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Idi Amin. As such we are just as capable of committing acts of gross evil that have been a part of mankind throughout his history. We’ve not been a perfect nation but we’ve never approached the level of hideousness seen in other nations. That’s despite the fact that our population consists of people who have for centuries been trying to slaughter one another in their home countries, whether it’s between the French and Germans, English and Irish, Japanese and Chinese, or Palestinians and Jews, Igbos and the Hausa of Nigeria. Thrown into the American mosaic are religions that have been in conflict for centuries such as Catholic and Protestant, and Christian and Muslim. The question is: Why is the United States an exception and will it remain so?
At the heart of the American idea is the deep distrust and suspicion the founders of our nation had for government, distrust and suspicion not shared as much by today’s Americans. Some of the founders’ distrust is seen in our Constitution’s language such as Congress shall not: abridge, infringe, deny, disparage, violate and deny. If the founders did not believe Congress would abuse our God-given rights, they would not have provided those protections. After all, one would not expect to find a Bill of Rights in Heaven; it would be an affront to God. Other founder distrust for government is found in the Constitution’s separation of powers, checks and balances and the several anti-majoritarian provisions such as the Electoral College and the requirement that three-quarters of state legislatures ratify changes in the Constitution.
The three branches of our federal government are no longer bound by the Constitution as the framers envisioned and what is worse is American ignorance and acceptance of such rogue behavior. Look at the current debate over government involvement in health, business bailouts and stimulus packages. The debate centers around questions as whether such involvement is a good idea or a bad idea and whether one program is more costly than another. Those questions are entirely irrelevant to what should be debated, namely: Is such government involvement in our lives permissible under the U.S. Constitution?
That question is not part of the debate. The American people, along with our elected representatives, whether they’re Republicans or Democrats, care less about what is and what is not permissible under our Constitution. They think Congress has the right to do anything upon which they can secure a majority vote, whether they have the constitutional or moral authority to do so or not. What Congress does have is the brute force to enforce compliance with their unconstitutional acts. You say, "What do you mean, Williams?" Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution grants Congress the power to tax and spend for the enumerated activities therein. Every American is duty bound to pay his share. Congress has neither constitution nor moral authority to take the earnings of one American for the benefit of another American. What do you think will happen to you if don’t comply, say with Congress' demand that part of your earnings be taken to bail out a failing business? You’ll see all the brute force that you want to see and if you resist too much, death is not off the table.
We are losing what’s made our country great. Instead of moving toward greater liberty, we’re moving toward greater government control of our lives.�
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)